Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Ther Adv Infect Dis ; 8: 2049936120981526, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1058224

ABSTRACT

Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is the transfer of screened and minimally processed faecal material from a 'healthy' donor to 'diseased' recipient. It has an established role, and is recommended as a therapeutic strategy, in the management of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Recognition that gut dysbiosis is associated with, and may contribute to, numerous disease states has led to interest in exploiting FMT to 'correct' this microbial imbalance. Conditions for which it is proposed to be beneficial include inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, liver disease and hepatic encephalopathy, neuropsychiatric conditions such as depression and anxiety, systemic inflammatory states like sepsis, and even coronavirus disease 2019. To understand what role, if any, FMT may play in the management of these conditions, it is important to consider the potential risks and benefits of the therapy. Regardless, there are several barriers to its more widespread adoption, which include incompletely understood mechanism of action (especially outside of CDI), inability to standardise treatment, disagreement on its active ingredients and how it should be regulated, and lack of long-term outcome and safety data. Whilst the transfer of faecal material from one individual to another to treat ailments or improve health has a history dating back thousands of years, there are fewer than 10 randomised controlled trials supporting its use. Moving forward, it will be imperative to gather as much data from FMT donors and recipients over as long a timeframe as possible, and for trials to be conducted with rigorous methodology, including appropriate control groups, in order to best understand the utility of FMT for indications beyond CDI. This review discusses the history of FMT, its appreciable mechanisms of action with reference to CDI, indications for FMT with an emerging evidence base above and beyond CDI, and future perspectives on the field.

2.
Orv Hetil ; 161(44): 1858-1871, 2020 11 01.
Article in Hungarian | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1042234

ABSTRACT

Összefoglaló. A székletmikrobiota-transzplantáció (faecalismikrobiota-transzplantáció - FMT) a Clostridioides difficile fertozés (CDI) kezelésében nemzetközileg széles körben elfogadott, megfelelo szakmai háttér mellett végezve biztonságos, potenciálisan életmento, költséghatékony, valamint a hospitalizációs ido és az orvos-beteg találkozások jelentos redukálására képes eljárás. Az FMT elvégzésére egyes országokban magas szintu minoségirányítási háttérrel muködo, célfeladatra szervezodött donor- és székletbankok rendezkedtek be. Máshol, így például hazánkban, az eljáráshoz az egyértelmu jogi szabályozási környezet, a standardizált technológiai háttér és a finanszírozás hiánya miatt nem egységes a hozzáférés. Régóta idoszeru továbbá, hogy a heterogén, nemegyszer háztartási eszközökkel elokészített beavatkozások helyett a nemzetközi és legújabban már a hazai ajánlásokban is megfogalmazott, a betegbiztonságot legjobban garantáló elvárások mellett történjen a széklettranszplantáció. Az új koronavírus (SARS-CoV-2) okozta pandémia megjelenése eroteljes szakmai érv országos szinten az FMT minoségirányítási környezetének és technológiai hátterének újragondolására, mert a SARS-CoV-2 egyszerre jelent kockázatot a CDI miatt kórházban kezelt sérülékeny betegpopulációnak, és egyben veszélyezteti az FMT biztonságosságát mind a recipiens, mind pedig az eljárást végzo egészségügyi személyzet tekintetében. Ezekre a szakmai és társadalmi kihívásokra reagálva, a széles köru beteghozzáférés és a legmagasabb szintu betegbiztonság garantálására, a Debreceni Egyetemen új eljárásrendet dolgoztunk ki az FMT végzésére. Ezen eljárásrendnek a COVID-19-pandémia miatt módosított, a fagyasztottgraftbank üzemeltetése és a rendszerszemlélet tekintetében releváns elemeit ismertetjük. Javasolt, hogy országos szinten hasonló, megfelelo minoségirányítási és technológiai környezettel, a SARS-CoV-2-fertozés kizárását is integráló donorszurési rendszerrel, továbbá fagyasztottgraft-banki háttérrel muködo laboratóriumok vegyenek részt a széklettranszplantációk végzésében. Felmerül továbbá, hogy az eljárást a számos analógia és a donor-recipiens koncepció alapján a sejt- és szövettranszplantációkra vonatkozó szabályozórendszer keretei közé ajánlott beágyazni. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(44): 1858-1871. Summary. Stool transplantation (faecal microbiota transplantation - FMT) is a widely accepted, potentially life-saving, cost-effective medical intervention for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), which has an acceptable safety profile if performed with an appropriate professional background. FMT can significantly reduce hospitalization time and the number of patient visits. National donor and stool banks with high-standard quality management systems were established in certain countries for supporting the procedures. In other regions, including Hungary, patient access is not uniform due to the lack of clear legal regulations, standardized technology or financial reimbursement. It has been expected for a long time to replace the heterogenous techniques, occasionally utilizing household equipment with a technology providing improved patient safety and fulfilling international and recently published local FMT guidelines. The emergence of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic is a very powerful argument in favour of urgently reconsidering the quality management and technological background of FMT procedures. SARS-CoV-2 is a major threat to the vulnerable patients suffering from CDI and also impose risks for the recipient and healthcare personnel involved in carrying out the transplantation. New FMT guidelines were implemented at the University of Debrecen to address these professional and public challenges, to provide wide patient access and to guarantee the highest achievable patient safety. Relevant elements of this new protocol are presented, focusing on a systemic quality management approach, on the operation of a frozen stool bank and on a modified donor screening algorithm taking the risks of COVID-19 into consideration. We suggest that laboratories with proper quality assurance and technological conditions, implementing SARS-CoV-2 donor screening and operating a frozen graft bank should participate in faecal microbiota transplantations. It is also recommended that, based on the analogies and the similar donor-recipient concept, FMT should be embedded under the organ tissue and cell transplantation polices in Hungary. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(44): 1858-1871.


Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections/therapy , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Clostridioides difficile , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation/methods , Humans , Hungary , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Quality Improvement , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
3.
Infect Prev Pract ; 2(3): 100069, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-640118

ABSTRACT

From its origins as a left-field, experimental, and even "maverick" intervention, faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is now a well-recognised, accepted, and potentially life-saving therapeutic strategy, for the management of recurrent Clostridiodes difficile infection (rCDI). It is being investigated as a treatment for a growing number of diseases including hepatic encephalopathy and eradication of antimicrobial resistant organisms, and the list of indications will likely expand in the future. There is no universally accepted definition of what FMT is, and its mechanism of action remains incompletely understood; this has likely contributed to the breadth of approaches to regulation depending on interpretation. In the UK FMT is considered a medicinal product, in North America, a biological product, whereas in parts of Europe, it is considered a human cell/tissue product. Regulation seeks to improve quality and safety, however, lack of standardisation creates confusion, and overly restrictive regulation may hamper widespread access and discourage research using FMT. FMT is generally considered safe, especially if rigorous donor screening and testing is conducted. Most short-term risks are associated with the delivery method (e.g. colonoscopy). Longer term risks are less well described but longitudinal follow-up of treated cohorts is in place to assess for this, and no signal towards harm has been found to date. Rarely it has been associated with adverse outcomes including the transmission of antibiotic resistant bacteria, and even death. It is vital patients undergoing FMT are well informed to the currently appreciated risks and benefits before proceeding.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL